Civil Compromise in California Criminal Cases (Penal Code 1377, 1378 PC)
When a person is charged with a California misdemeanor that also causes harm to a victim, the law sometimes permits a resolution that avoids a traditional criminal conviction.
This legal mechanism, known as a civil compromise, is codified in California Penal Code sections 1377 and 1378. It allows criminal charges to be dismissed if the defendant compensates the victim for the damages they have suffered.
In straightforward terms, the defendant makes amends to the victim for damages such as petty theft, vandalism, or embezzlement.
The victim's responsibilities include confirming full satisfaction, signing a statement accepting the compromise, and refraining from pursuing criminal prosecution.
A civil compromise provides a unique path for resolving certain criminal cases by focusing on restitution to the injured party.
It is an arrangement that, if approved by the court, can prevent a criminal conviction and the associated consequences, such as a permanent criminal record.
Key Takeaways
- In most criminal cases, victims seek justice through charges and convictions. While a conviction can bring relief, not all criminal issues require it for victims to be compensated for the defendant's actions.
- In some cases, a civil compromise can compensate the victim and prevent further criminal proceedings. When successful, it usually stops additional efforts to secure a conviction.
- A civil compromise involves the prosecutor or judge dismissing a criminal charge if you compensate the victim for their losses. Sometimes, prosecutors won't agree, but it may still be possible to obtain one.
- This agreement is common in criminal cases like theft and shoplifting. Civil compromise applies only to misdemeanor charges, excluding those against law enforcement, elders, or children. Felonies are ineligible.
- A typical example of a civil compromise involves a situation where someone is charged under California Penal Code 459.5 PC for shoplifting. The defendant reimburses the victim for their loss, leading the judge to dismiss the case.
What Exactly Is a Civil Compromise?
A civil compromise is a legal agreement between the defendant in a criminal case and the victim of the alleged crime.
Under this agreement, the defendant provides full restitution to the victim for the harm or financial loss caused by their actions.
In exchange, the victim agrees that they are satisfied with the compensation and do not wish to pursue criminal prosecution.
This process recognizes that certain offenses have both criminal and civil components.
While the state prosecutes the criminal aspect, the victim has a separate right to sue the defendant in civil court to recover damages.
What Are the Conditions?
A civil compromise effectively merges these two aspects, allowing the defendant to remedy the civil harm to resolve the criminal charges. For a civil compromise to be valid, several conditions must be met:
- The crime must be a misdemeanor.
- The offense must have a remedy available through a civil action (meaning the victim could sue for damages).
- The victim must appear in court and acknowledge that they have received satisfaction for their injury.
- The judge must approve the compromise, finding it is in the interest of justice.
The court has ultimate discretion to allow a civil compromise. The judge will consider the facts of the case, the defendant's criminal history, and the nature of the offense before deciding whether to dismiss the charges.
Common Civil Compromises Criminal Cases
As mentioned earlier, a civil compromise is a court-approved agreement where the judge dismisses the criminal charge if the defendant compensates the victim for damages caused by their actions.
Judges have the exclusive authority to decide on civil compromises. Such compromises are common in certain case types, including:
- Shoplifting - Penal Code 459.5 PC,
- Petty theft - Penal Code 484(a) PC,
- Embezzlement - Penal Code 503 PC,
- Vandalism - Penal Code 594 PC, and
- Other theft-related offenses.
How a Civil Compromise Works
The process of securing a civil compromise typically begins after criminal charges have been filed. The defendant, usually through their attorney, initiates contact with the victim to negotiate a settlement. The process involves several steps:
- Calculating Damages: The first step is to assess the victim's damages, including stolen or damaged property, medical bills, lost wages, and other financial losses caused by the defendant's alleged crime.
- Negotiation and Payment: After calculating damages, the defendant and victim (often through attorneys) negotiate a settlement. Once agreed, the defendant pays the victim.
- Court Appearance: The victim appears in court to confirm they've received full compensation and agree to dismiss the criminal charges.
- Judicial Review: The judge hears arguments from both sides regarding whether the criminal case should move forward.
- Case Dismissal: If the judge believes that a civil compromise is in the interests of justice, they will dismiss the criminal charges, closing the case permanently.
What Advantages Does a Civil Compromise Offer?
A civil compromise can be advantageous to the defendant, the victim, and the court. The defendant gains by avoiding a criminal conviction and the associated criminal record. The victim benefits by ensuring they receive compensation for any losses suffered.
The court benefits from a civil compromise because it enables quicker resolution of lower-level cases that do not need a full criminal trial.
Criminal cases often take a long time to progress through the system, causing delays in payment unless a civil compromise is reached.
Crimes Ineligible for Civil Compromise
California law explicitly prohibits civil compromise for certain types of misdemeanors. According to Penal Code 1377, a compromise is not available for offenses that are:
- Committed by or against a peace officer while executing their duties.
- Committed with an intent to commit a felony.
- Committed riotously.
- In violation of a court order, such as a protective or restraining order.
Furthermore, courts have consistently ruled that certain offenses are against public policy and are therefore ineligible for civil compromise, even if they are not explicitly listed in the statute. These include domestic violence, child abuse, and elder abuse.
The Role of a Skilled Criminal Defense Attorney
Navigating the civil compromise process requires strategic negotiation. A skilled California criminal defense attorney plays a crucial role in successfully achieving this outcome for a client.
An experienced attorney can identify if a case is eligible for a civil compromise early in the proceedings. They will analyze the charges, the evidence, and the nature of the harm to the victim to build a case for a compromise.
Defense strategies to secure a civil compromise often involve several key actions:
- Negotiating with the Victim: The attorney serves as an intermediary between the defendant and the victim. This delicate process must be handled professionally to avoid any appearance of witness tampering or intimidation. The attorney explains the civil compromise option and negotiates a fair restitution amount.
- Calculating Full Restitution: An attorney ensures the offered compensation covers all of the victim's legitimate losses. This is critical, as the victim must confirm in court that they have been "fully" satisfied.
- Persuading the Court: The most crucial task is convincing the judge to approve the compromise. The attorney prepares a compelling argument showing that the victim is compensated, that the defendant has accepted responsibility, and that dismissal serves the interests of justice.
Successfully negotiating a civil compromise can lead to the dismissal of charges, helping the defendant avoid a criminal record and its long-term effects. Reach out to Eisner Gorin LLP for a case review.

If you have one phone call from jail, call us! If you are facing criminal charges,